On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:33:09PM -0500, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote:
> > There are only two issues left in Jira for 2.2.
> >
> > I think MATH-488 could be considered resolved as the class has been
> > deprecated as requested 5 days ago.
> >
> > Concerning MATH-487, I understood we are going to keep
> > ConvergenceException as a base class for a bunch of lower level
> > exceptions. Who volunteers for this task and on what time frame ?
> >
> I will create JIRA and post a patch with the new exceptions this weekend.

How is this related to 2.2 ?
To avoid breaking user-code, it's safer not to change the raised exception.
[Or is it still the issue of easing the transition to 3.0 ?]

What also remains to do is to add deprecation tags in all the exception
classes that are outside the package "exception".
I can do that.

> > Apart from these Jira issues, Phil wanted to remove binary
> > incompatibilities. We said the incompatibilities in ODE could not be
> > removed as they are internal only and required to fix bugs. We did not
> > conclude on FunctionException/DerivativeException.
> 
> You convinced me (twice actually, sorry :) that there is no immediate
> user impact due to FunctionEvaluationException changes.  One thing
> that I did not mention before is that for UnivaritaRealFunction
> specifically, the new setup implies that *all* UnivariateRealFunctions
> are going to be user-defined functions.   I am not sure that this is
> strictly true (aren't there some places where [math] code creates
> UnivariateRealFunctions?) 

Yes, the interpolators for example.

> [...]


Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to