Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/ > > Maven artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp//io-2.0.1-rc1/maven/ > > Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > I have tested this with JDK 1.5 & 1.6 using maven2. > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.0.1-rc1/ > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/site/ > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 2.0.1 directories are > not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > > Clirr Report (compared to 2.0): > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/site/clirr-report.html > > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/site/rat-report.html > > tia
Building from source with IBM JDK 5.0 fails with an OOME in the FileCleaningTrackerTestCase. IBM JDK 6.0 fails two tests in WriterOutputStreamTest (the ones writing UTF16). Sun JDKs and IcedTea6 work though. I suspect IBM's JDKs to be erroneous here. Therefore: +1 - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
