On 21/12/2010 20:58, [email protected] wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Tue Dec 21 20:58:34 2010 > New Revision: 1051649 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051649&view=rev > Log: > fixed non-synchronized methods
Could the fields be volatile instead? I'd rather avoid use of synchronized if at all possible. Cheers, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
