Le 26/11/2010 14:14, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
>>> Should we simply allow user to register an instance of some optimizer
>> reconfigurator interface in the constructor ? Something like:
>>>
>>> public MultiStartDifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer(
>>> DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer optimizer,
>>> int starts,
>>> RandomVectorGenerator generator,
>>> OptimizerReconfigurator reconfigurator)
>>
>>> with
>>
>>> public interface OptimizerReconfigurator {
>>> public DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer
>>> reconfigure(DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer);
>>> }
>>
>> +1 from me.
>> Question is how reconfigure() is configured?
>> In the CMA-ES case this would mean how the population increase factor
>> Is defined. May be simply by an additional parameter for the
>> optimization algo?
>
> "reconfigure" returns the _new_ optimizer instance that will be used for the
> next start.
>
> However, can we slow down on the new features? (Am I saying this? ;-))
You are right, my bad.
Luc
> [We previously agreed that the main algorithm code should be put in place
> before any other bells and whistles.]
>
>
> Best regards,
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
