> [...] > > As I said, the use case driving the need for the package name change is > really beyond users' control, so I am +1 on the package name change for 3.0 > > > > > [1] I would be the first to have a little less work as a result of the name > > change.
+1 Gilles P.S. Can we do the change ASAP? Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
