On 15 November 2010 19:56, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 November 2010 19:30, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
> <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 November 2010 08:58,  <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > Author: rgoers
>>> > Date: Mon Nov 15 08:58:37 2010
>>> > New Revision: 1035190
>>> >
>>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1035190&view=rev
>>> > Log:
>>> > Sandbox was not dependent on vfs2. Convert many StringBuffers to
>>> StringBuilder.
>>>
>>> That has broken the build, as some public/protected methods still
>>> expect StringBuffer.
>>> The methods cannot be changed to use StringBuilder without breaking
>>> API compatibility.
>>>
>>
>> Broke the build how?  I get a clean build of both VFS and Commons
>> Configuration.
>
> The commit:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1035190&view=rev
>
> changed both AbstractFileObject.getURL()  and
> HostFileNameParser.parseUri to use StringBuilder; however both call
> public methods in UriParser which expect StringBuffer.
>

Sorry, looks like Eclipse messed up - in spite of synch.ing several
times, it did not show me all the outstanding updates.

A manual update has fixed the compile errors I was getting.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to