On 5 November 2010 17:36, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 November 2010 17:11, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>>> One thing that drives me nuts is that most project do not list the JRE
>>>> requirements on the front page of the project. It's not even in the
>>>> project dependencies either.
>>>>
>>>> So we should at least update the docs IMO for Java 5.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Not a blocker though.
>>>
>>> However, it seems that the news section should have been really updated
>>> as proposed: Minimum Java 1.4 (or 5 - depends on what we decide).
>>
>> It's not possible currently to compile the core code using Java 1.4.
>>
>> Since we ship source, I think this is a blocker.
>
> Not if we increase the (documented) minimum Java version to 5 ;-)
> Then Ralph can release if the vote passes.

But that requires a new RC to fix the version of Java which is in
pom.xml and of course in the Manifests.
Possibly elsewhere too in the source files.

Either way, I think we need a new RC.

> - Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to