On 5 November 2010 17:36, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> On 5 November 2010 17:11, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>>> One thing that drives me nuts is that most project do not list the JRE >>>> requirements on the front page of the project. It's not even in the >>>> project dependencies either. >>>> >>>> So we should at least update the docs IMO for Java 5. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Not a blocker though. >>> >>> However, it seems that the news section should have been really updated >>> as proposed: Minimum Java 1.4 (or 5 - depends on what we decide). >> >> It's not possible currently to compile the core code using Java 1.4. >> >> Since we ship source, I think this is a blocker. > > Not if we increase the (documented) minimum Java version to 5 ;-) > Then Ralph can release if the vote passes.
But that requires a new RC to fix the version of Java which is in pom.xml and of course in the Manifests. Possibly elsewhere too in the source files. Either way, I think we need a new RC. > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
