Hi James, thanks, understood. I take in charge yet another cycle of refactoring, I'll ping you all when in trouble about something :) Have a nice day and thanks for the feedbacks! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simone Tripodi > <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's why I wouldn't follow the option #2; but please, explain me >> which are the side effects of that design, so I can avoid to repeat >> the same mistake in the future. >> > > If you make the config objects immutable, you can just keep the config > references around and skip the copying in the reconfigure() method. I > don't think it would be difficult to implement things this way. We > don't want to let the JMX stuff dictate our API too much. The JMX > stuff can be less "elegant" for sure. Consider it to be just a UI > layer on top of our stuff. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
