+1 on this issue. I use VFS on a couple projects and this is always a bit burdensome, and on several occasions have indeed caught and rethrew RuntimeExceptions. Even if we can't/shouldn't soften them, what about typing them to be more specific? Having every method throwing a FileSystemException isn't always the most helpful =)
Steve On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:46 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > What do you folks think about making the exceptions extend > RuntimeException in 2.0? I really find it tedious to do try/catch > everywhere I want to ask a FileObject something (like if it exists or > not). > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
