Thanks for the feedback, I'm already in the process to convert them, previewing that junit4.x would have been accepted :P best, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:17 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 October 2010 15:36, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> Pool 1.X was using junit 3.8.1 for unit tests because of the Java1.3 >> retro compatibility, this test broke the build because junit 4.X is >> missing in the classpath, so I'd take advantage and migrate to junit >> 4, any abjection? just let me know, > > Oops! Done it again. I did test in Eclipse, but should have tested > using Maven as well. > > I agree - no need to keep the dependency on JUnit 3.8.1. > > JUnit 4.x still supports JUnit 3 tests (but not in the same class) > > It's not trivial to migrate existing tests to JUnit 4 (some will need > splitting), but I don't have any objections if you want to convert > them. > >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:46 PM, <s...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Author: sebb >>> Date: Wed Oct 13 12:46:01 2010 >>> New Revision: 1022080 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1022080&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Add basic tests for CursorableLinkedList >>> >>> Added: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
