I'm good with a pool consisting of one type of object On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 12/10/2010 15:03, James Carman wrote: >> Is it really realistic to think that a pool would support multiple >> object types? I've never really seen that in practice, but I guess it >> could happen. Just seems weird to me. > > +1. I'm having a hard time coming up with a use case where those objects > wouldn't support some common interface. And if that interface is Object, > just declare a pool of type Object. > > Lets not make things more complicated than they need to be. > > Mark > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Simone Tripodi >> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Brent! >>> sounds reasonably good, the only worry I've on it is about the method >>> >>> <V> V borrowObject(K key); >>> >>> because I don't know the type of V; speaking in therms of examples: >>> >>> new MyKeyedObjectPoolImpl<String>().borrowObject("one") = ??? >>> >>> So the APIs have to be improved following the Jame's suggestions. >>> Have a nice day! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Brent Worden <brent.wor...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> The javadoc on KeyedObjectPool states 'A keyed pool pools instances of >>>> multiple types.' However, the new parametrization on KeyedObjectPool >>>> allows >>>> for only a single instance type. >>>> >>>> To allow for pooling multiple typed instances, should the instance type >>>> parameter be removed from the interface declaration and placed on the >>>> relevant method declarations? In other words, replace: >>>> >>>> public interface KeyedObjectPool<K,V> { >>>> ... >>>> } >>>> >>>> with: >>>> >>>> public interface KeyedObjectPool<K> { >>>> >>>> <V> V borrowObject(K key); >>>> >>>> <V> void invalidateObject(K key, V obj); >>>> >>>> <V> void returnObject(K key, V obj); >>>> ... >>>> } >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Brent. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org