On 6 October 2010 12:53, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > So it's not a blocker then if we want to release?
No, I don't think it's a blocker, though we probably need to make the restrictions clearer. But of course it would be nice to have a solution ... > On Oct 6, 2010 7:21 AM, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6 October 2010 10:36, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >>>> >>>> I don't know if there is a workround. >>>> >>> >>> Is this something new? Did previous versions of exec pass these tests >>> on OpenVMS? >> >> No, not as far as I recall. >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
