On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are four people who think 2.0 (Stephen and myself in this thread > and Sebb and Dennis in the previous thread back in March[1]) that > think it should be 2.0. So far there are five who think 1.5 (Jörg, > James, Michael, Paul & Matt). So people disagree. Its OK to have a > massive debate on this, but I would much rather spend my time on > something less trivial than version number ideology. >
The problem is that you're causing some inconsistency. Bumping major version numbers without changing package name/artifactId doesn't go along with what Apache Commons has come up with as a "best practice" or sorts. Jumping to 2.0 also carries with it an assumption of binary incompatibility for most users. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
