Thanks a lot Seb!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:55 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 September 2010 13:37, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, I understand now that before I didn't understand why the Digester
>> build fails. That's driving me crazy :(
>
> I made a change which might help. Let's see what happens.
>
> Note that these failures don't necessarily mean that there is a
> problem with Digester.
> Given that it builds OK for you and when using Continuum [1], I think
> we can work on fixing Gump separately from any release.
>
> [1] 
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResults.action?projectId=75&projectGroupId=16
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:31 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 September 2010 13:22, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> OK thanks both guys, now I understand why the Digester build fails.
>>>
>>> I'm glad you understand, because I don't.
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell Digester should build OK, given that it depends
>>> on BeanUtils which builds OK.
>>>
>>> Note: the current BeanUtils trunk imports
>>> org.apache.commons.collections.FastHashMap, so for that to build it
>>> must be able to find the class.
>>>
>>> So why does Digester fail during tests?
>>>
>>> It may be a subtle Gump problem.
>>>
>>>> BTW I'd update the beanutils dependency to beanutils-core if there are
>>>> no objections, WDYT?
>>>
>>> No other projects depend on beanutils-core, so I don't think that's a good 
>>> idea.
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 12 September 2010 13:07, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> From what I understand, Gump tries to make sure that our "trunks" stay
>>>>>> in synch, so it's not honoring the specific BeanUtils dependency, but
>>>>>> instead running the build against BeanUtils' trunk.  Please correct me
>>>>>> if I'm wrong someone.  I've never really understood Gump very well. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> That is what Gump tries to do.
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Perhaps merely adding a dependency to commons collections would fix
>>>>>> your Gump issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> The Gump build already depends on Collections, and it is shown in the 
>>>>> classpath.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand why the missing class is in BeanUtils according to
>>>>> the stacktrace, yet BeanUtils appears to build OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've asked for some help on the Gump list.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi James, Seb,
>>>>>>> thanks for your feedbacks and your help!!! What is going to drive me
>>>>>>> crazy is that the latest released digester is successfully using the
>>>>>>> 1.8.0 release of BeanUtils; the current digester trunk is using the
>>>>>>> 1.8.3, (with some memory leaks fixes) and doesn't cause errors
>>>>>>> locally; even testing with only commons-beanutils-core-1.8.3 (a subset
>>>>>>> of the whole beanutils package) it continues working.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Follow below some bash executions on my machine... that's why I don't
>>>>>>> understand why it should fail on Gump :(
>>>>>>> All te best,
>>>>>>> Simo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commons-digester simone$ java -version
>>>>>>> java version "1.5.0_24"
>>>>>>> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
>>>>>>> 1.5.0_24-b02-357-10M3065)
>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_24-149, mixed mode, sharing)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commons-digester simone$ mvn -version
>>>>>>> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
>>>>>>> Java version: 1.5.0_24
>>>>>>> Java home: /XXXXX/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5.0/Home
>>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
>>>>>>> OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "i386" Family: "unix"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commons-digester simone$ mvn clean test
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> Tests run: 174, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [INFO] 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>>>>>>> [INFO] 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> [INFO] Total time: 8 seconds
>>>>>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Sep 12 13:45:28 CEST 2010
>>>>>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 27M/508M
>>>>>>> [INFO] 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, James Carman
>>>>>>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:39 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On further investigation, it is collections/trunk - i.e. collections4
>>>>>>>>> - which does not have FastHashMap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The default Collections version used by Gump is based on
>>>>>>>>> tags/PRE_GENERICS_MERGE which does have FastHashMap, so there is a
>>>>>>>>> different problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll look further.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The BeanUtils folks recently decided to remove the collections classes
>>>>>>>> from their jar(s) in favor of an optional dependency I believe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to