On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> just to give you a brief recap of the completed actions:
> - tests have been migrated to JUnit 4;
> - project structure has been moved to default Maven archetype structure;
> - ant build & config have been removed;
> - whole documentation has been moved to site, in the xdoc format.
>
<snip/>

Great :-)


> There still is the 'examples' dir that's using ant to build the small
> subprojects, what do you think on moving them too to a maven build?
<snap/>

I don't think thats a requirement for the next release. I also don't
think we want to introduce a multi-module m2 build for digester, so
best to keep that build on its own (even if moved to m2) as it is now.

In effect -- if someone wants to do it, sure.

-Rahul


> Thanks in advance, have a nice day :)
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately they are just components mocks used in proper unit
>> tests, they don't contain test methods, so 1) should be the better
>> solution.
>> Thanks Seb!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 1 September 2010 09:24, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> migrating to Junit4 I met a small issue that can be easily resolved in
>>>> more that 1 way, I'd like to discuss with you how we want doing it:
>>>>
>>>> Tests in error:
>>>>  initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.TestDigesterRulesSource)
>>>>  initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.plugins.TestObject)
>>>>  initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.TestObjectCreationFactory)
>>>>  initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.TestObject)
>>>>
>>>> These classes are not unit test at all but rather classes to support
>>>> tests, but because of the name pattern, surefire tries to execute them
>>>> as unit test, but Junit4 fails because no test methods are present in
>>>> these classes.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK we can fix it in 2 ways:
>>>>
>>>> 1) renaming all the class name;
>>>> 2) adding fake test methods
>>>>
>>>> I'm for 1, what do you suggest to proceed?
>>>
>>> Or one can:
>>>
>>> 3) Add exclusions to the POM.
>>> - just added for completeness, as I prefer 1)
>>>
>>> However, if there is a useful test that can be added to a support
>>> class, then 2) is the way to go.
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance, best regards!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks a lot guys,
>>>>> now the scope is much more clear to me. I'll proceed according to what
>>>>> we agreed.
>>>>> Have a nice day!!!
>>>>> Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:22 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 31 August 2010 22:54, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>>> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>> one more question: what about keeping or removing the Test
>>>>>>>> classes/methods that just declare the Suite? AFAIK are not more
>>>>>>>> needed...
>>>>>>> <snip/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't have a strong opinion -- if someone wants to do it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forgot to say I'm +1 on removing these.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just need to be careful in case there is a suite which is used to
>>>>>> ensure that certain tests are run in a particular order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise, the main() and suite() methods are unnecessary, and it's
>>>>>> too easy to add a test class and forget to add the class to the suite.
>>>>>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to