On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > thanks for your help! I'm not a commons committer and haven't checked > yet if my apache id is enabled to login into Gump (but I don't think > it does) <snip/>
Any Apache committer can edit Gump metadata, search here [1] for digester. -Rahul [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/commons-proper.xml > Have a nice day, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:03 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 24 August 2010 08:12, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I had a look at the ant build that Gump executes, the 'test' target >>> doesn't ignore abstract test case, adding the following lines: >>> >>> <exclude name="**/Abstract*TestCase.java"/> >>> <exclude name="**/Abstract*Test.java"/> >>> >>> In the 'test' taget fixes the broken build. Hope this helps! >> >> Since the non-Gump build uses Maven, then it would be worth switching >> to Maven for Gump as well. >> This should fix the problem (and is something any committer can do). >> >> It's now not essential to have Ant builds: >> - Gump can now process Maven builds >> - Commons parent allows build/test with Java 1.3/1.4 etc. >> >> So unless there are other good reasons for keeping the Ant build, it >> could perhaps be dropped entirely. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
