Please find it in the following url: http://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_sGdVRvWdcXOGRhYmZkZjctODJhZS00Nzg5LThkN2EtMzZjZGY5ZjIyNTRk&hl=en&authkey=COXhhb8F
It should be accessible. thanks -Sai On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Attachments are stripped. Can you put the reports onto a web-site? > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Sai Zhang <szh...@cs.washington.edu > >wrote: > > > Hi all: > > > > I am now writing an automated test generation tool for Java, and use > Apache > > Common Collections > > version 3.2 (latest release) as one of the experimental benchmarks. > > > > > > According to the tool design and its internal checking mechanism, it > > generates many failing tests. > > I attach 10 (executable failing tests in JUnit form) in attachment, and > am > > wondering could you > > please have a look at that, to check whether they are real bugs or not? > > > > The 10 tests presented in the attachments violates one of the common Java > > code practices (at least in my viewpoint): > > if all the inputs are not null, there should not be null pointer > exception > > thrown. > > > > The Junit tests attached are fully automatically generated, thus, the > > readability might not be so good. sorry... > > But they are generally relatively short. > > > > Thanks very much for your time! And any suggestion to the generated tests > > (including format and other aspects) > > are welcome! > > > > Best > > > > > > -Sai > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >
