On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
James Carman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson
<[email protected]> wrote:
But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument
preserves the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed
result
in a single method?
Most definitely! I like that idea. I would think that would be the
best way to kill two birds with one stone.
This move worked out for proxytoys quite well ... ;-)
Not sure why one of our own never mentioned the existence of
ProxyToys, but go figure. ;) I hate to exhibit NIH, but since I
jumped into [proxy] partly to find a home for my fluent stubbed proxy
code, I guess I'll persevere here.
That said, James: what do you think about the fact that in ProxyToys
*everything* is about Invokers, and everything else is expressed in
those terms. So where [proxy] has an Interceptor, ProxyToys has a
Decorating Invoker, and where [proxy] delegates to an ObjectProvider,
ProxyToys uses a DelegatingInvoker. I can see how this makes for a
simpler interface.
-Matt
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
