One other thought. It would definitely be worth discussing if the Log4j 2.0 API could eliminate the need for Commons Logging.
Ralph On May 29, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: > Apache log4j 2.0 has been a long simmering bunch of wish lists and a little > experimental code waiting for a sufficient community to assemble to start > fleshing things out. Not sure if we are there yet, but looks like there is > some signs of life and it would be good to have as many perspectives as > possible while things are settling down. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2 are general design objectives, > wishes, etc. Please feel free to add new bugs for concerns, pain points with > log4j 1.2 or other logging frameworks, or anything else that you think would > be helpful. > > Hopefully will reorganize the log4j 2.0 landing page this weekend to make > things more accessible. Discussion is on the log4j-dev mailing list. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
