Hadn't ran a test case, so I just now made the following changes to
ConstructorUtilsTest:
public class ConstructorUtilsTest extends TestCase {
...
public void testGetAccessibleConstructor() throws Exception {
...
assertNull(ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor(
NestedPrivateClass.DeeplyNestedClass.class,
ArrayUtils.EMPTY_CLASS_ARRAY));
}
private static class NestedPrivateClass
{
public static class DeeplyNestedClass
{
public DeeplyNestedClass(){}
}
}
}
and it failed. I'll submit it in JIRA. It looks like Class.getModfiers() only
returns the modifiers explicitly declared on the class.
________________________________
From: Henri Yandell <[email protected]>
To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 3:51:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Lang] Question about Accessible Criteria
Interesting question.
I think it should - unless the method Modifier.isPublic method check
checks that already.
Have you tried a test case to see if this would return an invalid constructor?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, D Sledge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at the method ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor(Constructor),
> I notice that the method checks if the declaring class is public. Should it
> not also make sure that the declaring class is either a top-level one or its
> enclosing class hierarchy are all public, too?
>
> D
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
