On 26/03/2010, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>  > On 26/03/2010, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> Tag:
>  >>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC2/
>  >
>  > Some files were missing SVN:EOL (applied to trunk)
>  >
>
> Good catch.  Lets all make sure we have our svn clients configured
>  to add these
>  (http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config)
>
> > 1 missing AL header (applied to trunk).
>
>
> Yikes!  Sorry I missed that.
>
> >
>  > Notice was still 2009 - fixed in trunk.
>  >
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
>
>  >>  Distributions:
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/
>  >
>  > No SHA1 hashes, seems odd as the Mvn dist has them.
>  > (Not a blocker, can be added later)
>
>
> We only link and mirror the md5s on dist/, so I see no reason to
>  include sha1 hashes for the official release tars/zips.
>
> >
>  > Builds and tests OK on 1.5 and 1.6; I got one failure in one of the
>  > runs of RandomDataTest but that is just my luck!
>  >
>  >>  Maven artifacts:
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/maven/
>  >
>  > However these do have both SHA1 and MD5 hashes.
>  >
>  >>  Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/docs/
>  >
>  > Looks good.
>  >
>  >>  Output of maven:site run against the source distribution:
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC2/site/
>  >
>  > Not a blocker, but it's confusing to have the Javadocs for the
>  > previous releases near the top, and the Javadocs for 2.1 buried low
>  > down.
>  >
>  > If possible, I would put the old docs under a separate heading much
>  > further down.
>
>
> I don't care much about this.  If others agree, we can rearrange.
>  Users may be used to the current setup though and annoyed by the change.

In which case I suggest at least adding the current Javadocs at the
head of the list (and perhaps drop the oldest).

> >
>  > Also, does it make sense to publish the RAT report?
>  > Surely that is mainly (only) needed for release checking?
>
>
> I agree; but to get rid of it we have to open up the argument of
>  what reports belong in the commons-parent pom.  Personally, I would
>  get rid of all of them (precisely for this reason - you can't get
>  rid of anything included there); but I understand the other viewpoint.
>
> >
>  >>  Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 0200 GMT 29-March 2010
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>  >>  [ ] +0 OK, but...
>  >>  [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>  >
>  > -0 - missing AL header and Notice year.
>  >
>  > Might also be an idea to remove the mantissa and experimental
>  > directory trees from the SVN tag, as they don't form part of the
>  > release?
>
>
> Crap.  Forgot to do that.  Will omit from the RC3 tag.
>
> >
>  > Better yet, can we move them out of trunk, e.g. into a branch (or the
>  > bit bucket?)
>
>
> Moving to branches would be a good idea, IMO.  What do others think?
>
>  Thanks for the review.
>
>
>  Phil
>
> >
>  >>  [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>  >>
>  >>  Thanks!
>  >>
>  >>  Phil
>  >>
>  >>  P.S.: I would appreciate it if an OSGi expert could review the
>  >>  generated material in the jar manifest and assure us that we will
>  >>  not get complaints on its suitability.
>  >>
>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>  >
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to