On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Each if you split Collections into Maven children, you would still > wouldn't want to release them independently. That would be a gigantic > administrative error. Struts was thinking about doing the same thing > with its libraries, but we turned away from it -- THANKFULLY. How > would you explain to users what versions are compatible with each > other? It becomes a nightmare to manage.
Both extreme options are nightmares imo. Holding everything up while you to release everything in sync is painful too. Struts has the advantage of a common entry point already. I would be tempted to schedule major upgrade cycles, while having minor ones run independently. Still tricky to do, and hurts innovation. Then again - having a scheduled 'v4.0 of all Commons components will now be available to be worked on' time might make innovation happen more easily. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org