Seems fine to me. On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback so far. However, before taking concrete actions I > would like to put the question again in a broader scope. > > The question is: Is it okay for a component to change its minimum required > JDK from 1.3 to 1.4 in a minor release? > > I just want to make sure that there are no vetos when it comes to the next > release. > > Oliver > >> Oliver Heger wrote: >> >>> Currently the 1.x version of [configuration] requires JDK 1.3. I wonder >>> whether it makes sense to switch to JDK 1.4 instead. >>> >>> I used to think that a switch of the minimum JDK version was only >>> possible for a major release. However, JDK 1.3 reached its EOL so long >>> ago that this should not be an issue now. >>> >>> Also, JDK 1.4 would make some things easier for us. For instance, we >>> could drop some XML-related dependencies. And we would not have to test >>> a release on a JDK 1.3. >>> >>> Are there any objections? >> >> +1, go ahead >> >> - Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
