I wouldn't like to see a dependency on mahout code in a "commons" library. That seems kind of backwards. If Mahout wants to offload this stuff, we can move it into a library in commons (which is typically how stuff used to happen in Jakarta).
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mahout now has a fork of a portion of the 'category A' portion of the > CERN colt library forked. The Mahout fork is, of course, in the Mahout > tree under a Mahout Java package and Maven triple. > > I want to use the collections classes from Mahout as the core to a new > set of commons-primitives classes that do the useful things that GNU > Trove does. > > The classes I want to start from depend on the classes that are in the > Mahout fork. > > As a temporary expedient, I can depend on their there. However, I > submit that it would be more better if the mathematical code were in > commons-math. Was this option explored? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
