Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here > for better visibility. > > Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies. > > -Rahul > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma? >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with >>> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and >>> after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they >>> then become one of the most active coders of that component. >>> >>> So +1 to a sandbox branch to primitives if you have ideas you'd like >>> to play with. ASF committers get karma to the sandbox on request, so >>> just need you to want to do that and we can add karma. >>> >>> Hen >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Stephen, >>>> >>>> It's interesting to me that the world in general knows about Trove, >>>> but not so much this. >>>> >>>> The fact that the front page is labelled with a snapshot version might >>>> have something to do with it, but I am kind of mystified. One thing >>>> that I'd like to add that Trove has is a full generic object hash map >>>> that is an open hash to avoid the space bloat of the stock Java >>>> HashMap. >>>> >>>> I am willing to make time to work on this. Since I'm not a committer >>>> at commons, I'm thinking that my proposed lab is a reasonable place to >>>> put in some effort and then bring it back into commons. Or maybe I >>>> should just start teeing up patches at commons? I find that >>>> reorganizing changes that might be called for to do generics and such >>>> are really clumsy in patches, so svn cp-ing to a lab might still make >>>> sense. >>>> >>>> I'm copy the labs list to test if I'm making a particle of sense. >>>> >>>> --benson >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne >>>> <scolebou...@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>>>> Benson Margulies wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of >>>>>> something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as >>>>>> setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather >>>>>> dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on >>>>>> primitives? >>>>> >>>>> I think [primitives] is stable and complete, thus appears rather quiet. >>>>> >>>>> I'd also point out Joda-Primitives - >>>>> http://joda-primitives.sourceforge.net/ >>>>> >>>>> Its a fork of the concept of [primitives] but with an API design I felt >>>>> more >>>>> comfortable with. However, I don't have time to work on it (generify, >>>>> release). I'll grant access to anyone that wants to help on it. >>>>> >>>>> Stephen >>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
