Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 17:39: [snip] > Did you miss that I cut out the "commons" from the artifactId?
Yes, I missed it :D > That way we have commons-dbcp-1.3.jar and dbcp-1.3.jar in the wild. > I guess I liked "dbcp" better than "commons-dbcp4" for the new > artifactId. IIUC, the only reason we have kept the "commons-" on > the relocated commons artifactIds for components moved thus far is > so the relocation poms will work. Since we are not doing that > here, we can make a clean break and use what seems to me at least a > more natural artifactId. As always, could be I am missing something. No, you're totally right, "dbcp" and "commons-dbcp4" are equal from the technical point of view. However, I feel a bit like Niall here dropping "commons-" as prefix. But that's just me, we're both simply pressed by the necessity to have a different name. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
