Any other opinion ?
Sebb, Rahul, what's your take ?
Thanks
Henrib
Henrib-2 wrote:
>
> One (non Maven related) question for the JEXL community:
>
> The (soon-to-be published) JEXL-2.0 RCx version comes with a lot of
> changes. The upper level API deprecates ExpressionFactory & ScriptFactory
> - replaced by JexlEngine -, Expression methods that used to throw
> exceptions (ParseException, Exception) throw unchecked exceptions and the
> inner level classes (o.a.c.{util,introspection,etc}) have to many changes
> to be listed.
>
> Upper level API code compatibility has been checked through Jelly and more
> recently through Commons Configuration; 1.1 behavior seems preserved
> enough for the switch to JEXL-2.0 to be one compilation away.
> However, with so many changes and not so many checks, it may be preferable
> to be on the safe side and put the whole JEXL-2.0 into
> org.apache.commons.jexl2; this would allow 1.1 dependant code to continue
> living its merry way (OSGi non withstanding) and let switchers decide when
> to actually perform the switch.
>
> We need your opinions and options; let us know.
> Cheers
> Henrib
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/JEXL-2-0-o-a-c-jexl-or-o-a-c-jexl2-tp727081p758756.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
