Phil, I understand your opinion, but I don't agree with you (but I accept that you have a different meaning about things just as I expect you to accept mine). I'm sure this is quite common in projects like this, and are interesting in hearing how matters like this are settled? Are there any committers besides you - and how many? And do you guys they have some sort of private list where you discuss this or is it totally up to you to decide how this ends (maybe waiting for others on the list to have their saying)? I don't mean to be rude or impolite, so excuse me if I am; I just don't know how this stuff works.
Cheers, Mikkel. 2009/10/31 Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>: > Is that a completely unchangeable opinion? > > Would you be willing to live with data generation in the distribution > classes even if you don't particularly like it? > > Would user opinions sway your opinion if we had some way of collecting them? > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > What do you think about the proposal at >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-310 in regards to our >> > discussion on the topic? >> >> As I said above, I am not in favor of adding random data generation >> to the distributions package. >> > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
