Hi guys, I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me say that sounds great, commons-validation has to be the proper home for JSR303, I'd like to contribute in this project since I already started studying the spec :) All the best, Simone
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > +! > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Niall Pemberton >> <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The current trunk in the validator2 sandbox is a copy of the Validator >>> 1.4 code from "commons proper" - but I think we should dump all the >>> existing validator framework code and just retain the "routines" >>> package. Trying to maintain any sort of compatibility with the >>> existing validator framework would be alot more work and code and >>> create a real mess IMO and I think it would be better to not to even >>> try. The "routines" package was refactored realtively recently(!) and >>> can stand on its own. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
