Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
ralph.goers @dslextreme.com schrieb:
I'm trying to port my changes to fix CONFIGURATION-390 from my trunk
sandbox
to configuration2-experimental. But there are two CombinedConfiguration
classes, one in the main directory and one under combined. Which one
should
be removed and which needs the fix?
Ralph
The one under combined should be the final one. Sorry for the confusion.
This is a big problem for me. I tried switching
DefaultConfigurationBuilder to the combined/CombinedConfiguration and
got all kinds of errors in TestDefaultConfigurationBuilder (also
switching that to use combined). I've spent days trying to figure out
how to merge the CONFIGURATION-390 changes to the branch without much luck.
Obviously the branch is a pretty mess with work started and not
finished. I think DefaultConfigurationBuilder still uses the old classes
because not all of its dependencies have been ported to use the
AbstractHierarchicalConfiguration base class.
Meanwhile I work on some new ideas in the base package which are yet a
different approach.
No idea how we can clean up things. Maybe I should do my new experiments
in a new branch?
For the reloading problem I wonder whether it makes sense at all to
apply these changes to the branch. IMHO we should redesign the reloading
operations completely for configuration2.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
