On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Numerical issues should not impinge on a computation this small.
...
> Your usage appears to be in accord with the suggested usage, but have you
> tried it with a tolerance of, say, 1e-3?
This gives the same result: {(NaN); (NaN); (NaN)}-- Axel Kramer http://code.google.com/p/symja --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
