Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote at Freitag, 18. September 2009 07:20:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> > wrote: >> On 2009-09-17, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Though it wouldn't make Gump's life any easier. In fact life would get >>> worse until they set up a separate v3 version anyway. Which I think is >>> what's happened for Lang. >> >> Yes this is what we did - and likely will do for collections. >> >> So the answer to my initial question is that projects are expected to >> depend on the latest release of collections or trunk but can't expect to >> work with both. >> >> Are you expecting to change the groupId as well? This would make Gump's >> live easier ;-) > > I think so. Even if we elected to use the same package name, but were > not backwards compatible, I would still see us changing group name. > Same for Lang. We agree here, however, the first question, we should answer is: Does collections-3 has to be incompatible i.e. is this only a temporary issue for Gump or should we make a hard cut? - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
