Matt Benson wrote:

> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Alexander Kahl <ak...@imttechnologies.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Alexander Kahl <ak...@imttechnologies.com>
>> Subject: jxpath 1.3 / mockrunner dependency
>> To: dev@commons.apache.org
>> Cc: "Alexander Kurtakov" <akurt...@redhat.com>
>> Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 3:22 AM
>> Hi Apache Commons Developers,
>> 
>> I'm a packager for the Fedora Project and co-maintainer of
>> jxpath. We,
>> the maintainers of jxpath, recently tried to update to the
>> latest
>> version 1.3 and realized that building the package requires
>> mockrunner
>> which seems to be quite unmaintained and pulls in
>> unbearable
>> dependencies like a full-fledged J2EE stack. We would
>> therefore like to
>> ask you to migrate to a modern, actively maintained
>> replacement like
>> easymock2. Other downstream projects (esp. distributions)
>> that depend on
>> building from source would also benefit from doing so.
>> 
>> Please share your thoughts with us.
>> 
> 
> Hi--I'd qualify as the maintainer of [jxpath] but I have admittedly had
> little time for it lately.  I actually can't recall what mockrunner is
> needed for, but I will take your complaint under advisement and look into
> it.  For the record, I've been having good luck with mockito lately so I
> might look at migrating jxpath to that.

It would be best to open a JIRA issue with it, so it does not get lost and
it might be a good starting point for someone getting familiar with
jxpath's codebase ... ;-)

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to