> -----Original Message----- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:43 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [codec] Are we ready for Codec 1.4 RC4? > > On 06/08/2009, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are there any more changes people want to do before cutting another > > Codec 1.4 RC?
The CPD reports to duplicated code that we could address, but this is not critical enough to hold up a release. Aside from that, let's go! > > I just did a quick scan looking for any mutable variables. > There are some variables which ought to be final; these are already > documented as to be treated as final so no problem. > > The only exception is DoubleMetaphone.maxCodeLen, which needs > revisiting for a later release. > > There is one package protected static final array, i.e. > Base64.CHUNK_SEPARATOR (test code needs access) > > This could be fixed by adding a package protected accessor which > returned a copy of the array and making the array private. That's not > essential. The issue with a fix like this one and others issues reported by FindBugs is that the fixes break binary compatibility (for example, org.apache.commons.codec.net.URLCodec.ESCAPE_CHAR is not final but should be.) Sure, no one is probably changing ESCAPE_CHAR, but binary compatibility can only be broken in a major release (2.0, 3.0, etc) > > Otherwise looks OK to me. Agreed. Gary > > > Niall > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org