On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:25 PM, <s...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Sat Aug 1 20:25:38 2009 > New Revision: 799919 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799919&view=rev > Log: > JEXL-50 - correct DIV documentation > JEXL-64 - clarify allowable variable names > > Modified: > commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/xdocs/reference/syntax.xml > > Modified: commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/xdocs/reference/syntax.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/xdocs/reference/syntax.xml?rev=799919&r1=799918&r2=799919&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/xdocs/reference/syntax.xml (original) > +++ commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/xdocs/reference/syntax.xml Sat Aug 1 > 20:25:38 2009 > @@ -60,8 +60,19 @@ > <li>Invalid: > <code>9v</code>,<code>!a99</code>,<code>1$</code></li> > </ul> > <p> > + Variable names are case-sensitive, e.g. <code>var1</code> and > <code>Var1</code> are different variables. > + </p> > + <p> > JEXL also supports <code>ant-style</code> variables, e.g. > <source>my.dotted.var</source> > is a valid variable name. > + <br/> > + N.B. the following keywords are reserved, and cannot be used > as a variable name or property when using the dot operator: > + <code>or and eq ne lt gt le ge div mod not null true false > new</code> > + For example, > + <code>my.new.dotted.var</code> > + is invalid. > + In such cases, the [ ] operator can be used, for example: > + <code>my.['new'].dotted.var</code> <snip/>
The bit in the line above is not a valid JEXL expression (can't conflate the . and [ ] operators like that). My JIRA comment was as-intended, will fix in SVN. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
