On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Henrib<[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been recently through a lot of the code so I'm confident enough about > its thread-safety to use it in this way (share an instance of a UnifiedJEXL > engine & its underlying JexlEngine). > > However, I dont intend to use it through the jsr-223 interface; if the > jsr-223 "multi-threaded engine" or "thread isolated engine" properties were > to be considered an important feature for Jexl, I'd gladly help and > contribute some cycles on this. > I guess if this ever comes important enough, someone in the community will > create a subtask of JEXL-63. > > I'll focus for now on JEXL-43 & friends. :-) > <snip/>
Yup, good plan :-) -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
