Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >>> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> >>>> Phil Steitz a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Phil Steitz a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the >>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>> code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and >>>>>>>> conditions of the following licenses." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This would be appropriate if we were shipping sources from >>>>>>>> differently >>>>>>>> licensed components. What we have done - I think (IANAL) - is >>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>> *derivative works* from the original sources. Someone can >>>>>>>> correct me >>>>>>>> if I am wrong, but I don't see how that means that we now have >>>>>>>> "subcomponents" with separate license terms. Can someone explain >>>>>>>> this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Phil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suggest the following change: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- LICENSE.txt (revision 798724) >>>>>>> +++ LICENSE.txt (working copy) >>>>>>> @@ -203,12 +203,12 @@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -APACHE COMMONS MATH SUBCOMPONENTS: >>>>>>> +APACHE COMMONS MATH DERIVATIVE WORKS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> -separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the >>>>>>> source >>>>>>> -code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and >>>>>>> -conditions of the following licenses. >>>>>>> +The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents >>>>>>> +whose implementation is derived from orgininal sources written >>>>>>> +in C or Fortran. License terms of the original sources >>>>>>> +are reproduced below. >>>>>>> >>>>>> This is much better than my simple copy from the example. >>>>>> I'll check it in in a few minutes, thanks for the fix >>>>>> >>>>>> Luc >>>>>> >>>>> Got on piece of feedback from legal-discuss, which is to make explicit >>>>> which classes in [math] depend on which of the original sources. That >>>>> should be added to LICENSE.txt either at the top or in the section for >>>>> each original source. >>>>> >>>> This is already the case. In fact, in addition to the attributions >>>> formerly in the NOTICE file and now in the LICENSE file, >>>> >>> What was suggested was that in LICENSE and NOTICE files themselves, we >>> should specify which commons-math files depend on which original >>> sources. Currently, the original sources are just listed, with no >>> reference to the classes that are derived (in part) from them. >>> >> >> OK. I've added it. >> >> Luc >> >> > Thanks!
Are we ready for another RC ? Luc > > Phil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
