sebb-2-2 wrote:
>
> Of course if you try to use the new classes on Java 1.5 without also
> providing BSF 3.0 the JVM will complain, but otherwise the Jexl jar
> will run fine on Java 1.5.
>
I'm sorry I don't understand this correctly. Are you saying that that BSF3.0
will become an added dependency to Jexl for those wishing to run on Java5
(please dont say yes...)?
Looking at the BSF 3.0b2 branch, it seems it is an implementation of jsr-233
for pre-java6 (packages being javax.script); if so, it also seems there is
no impossibility to derive several of the Jexl classes to make a different
jar (jexl-233.jar) that depend upon it.
If the premises stand, it would allow those who can use jsr-233 (if you use
JDK6) or deploy the BSF beta 2 (if you are allowed to deploy beta) to use
Jexl by just adding the jexl-233.jar on top of jexl.jar. It does not force
everyone who uses Jexl to change their current set of dependencies.
A lot has been done to "customize" Jexl and if there are some missing parts
for such a task, I'd happily help if allowed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-JEXL--2.0-and-BSF---JSR-223-tp24706519p24727425.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
