On 28/07/2009, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > sebb wrote at Montag, 27. Juli 2009 23:14: > > > > On 27/07/2009, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > [sinp] > > > >> I dont know the plugin, but looking at the code it looks like it > >> generates the jar and extracts the manifest: > >> > >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/maven-bundle-plugin-2.0.0/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/bundleplugin/ManifestPlugin.java > >> > >> So it looks like either you would have to do something similar or just > >> use Bnd to create the jar > > > > I was beginning to wonder if that would be necessary ... seems to me > > that this will be quite a lot of work for no direct gain to Commons. > > > > Let's wait for a patch ;-) > > > Maybe we should start asking the other way round: Why do *we* want to > maintain an additional Ant build file? We build our artifacts with Maven, > vote on them and distribute exactly those in the end. I'd never expect to > get the exactly same jar using a different build system. If somebody want > an Ant build he can use the maven-ant-plugin > (http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ant-plugin/) to create the > build.xml. > > WDYT? >
FIne by me - but does the Ant plugin generate the necessary bundle commands to generate the OSGI headers? > - Jörg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
