sebb wrote:
On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
The files are here:
 http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/

findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
This is intended. The associated reports are not enabled in the release pom, so there is no reason to distribute these files with the release.
RELEASE-NOTES.txt is missing from the SVN tag.
This is a generated file. I guess I could check in before making the tag, but then it would not be generated from the tag itself.
NOTICE.txt has 2008.
Good catch.  Thanks!
I'm not sure why, but the $Id: SVN tags in some of the XML files
differ between the source file and a checkout of the SVN tag. This
should not happen if the tag is used to create the build.
The release was generated from the tag.  Which files?
It would be nice if the sources jar manifest had Spec. and Impl. entries.
Looks like you fixed this.  Thanks!
Ant test works OK on Java 1.3.1

Mvn test (Java 1.6.0) reports

[WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered
resources, i.e. build is platform dependent!

Also the test fails for me:

Failed tests:
testBorrowObjectFairness(org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPool)
 Time elapsed: 2.468 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
        at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
        at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:53)
        at 
org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPool.testBorrowObjectFairness(TestGenericObjectPool.java:1434)

The Test case ought to be a bit more explicit as to why the test failed.

I suspect it may be an error in the unit-test code - the TestThread
class has various fields that are accessed across threads without any
synchronisation.
I don't think the TestThread instance fields are accessed across threads. The test case is timing sensitive, as indicated in the comment. That said, this is a new test case, testing new code, so we need to find out exactly what is going on.

IIUC what the test is trying to do (Mark can correct me if I am wrong), it is launching 500 threads, numbered by their array indices, with 10 ms delays between starts and they confirming that they get served in start order. The way that it confirms order is by leveraging the fact that the test factory produces numbered objects, 0, 1, 2, ...., maxActive - 1. So thread i should get object i mod maxActive. That is what is being tested in the line you have narrowed the failure to.


 The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_RC1/

NOTICE.txt says:

Copyright 1999-2008 The Apache Software Foundation

I think this does need to be fixed.

DOAP file does not have an AL header (not a blocker, I'll fix trunk)
Thanks!

Thanks for reviewing and for your help with the issues.

Phil
 Have at it!

 Thanks!

 Phil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to