On 22/05/2009, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On 21/05/2009, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> I don't expect this to pass the first vote - they never do :)
>  >>
>  >>  ---
>  >>
>  >>  Tag:
>  >>
>  >>  
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/collections/tags/COLLECTIONS_3_3_RC1
>  >
>  > Which revision is this? I'm assuming r777000 (nice number!)
>
>
> Not a clue :)

Since tags are not guaranteed immutable, it's necessary to qualify the
URL with the revision. This is present in the original commit message
and svn info / Last Changed Rev:

>
>  > Two files don't have AL headers:
>  >
>  > doap_collections.rdf
>
>
> Not in the release, so not bothered. I've added a header.
>
>  > pom.xml
>
>  That would be the fault of the release plugin. I'll try Rahul's
>  suggestion next time and make sure to check.
>
>
>  >
>  > This means the .pom file is also missing the AL header.
>  >
>  > NOTICE.txt says:
>  > Copyright 2001-2008
>
>
> Fixed.
>
>
>  > README.txt includes full details of the Ant targets, but does not
>  > mention any Maven targets. It should mention the ones that correspond
>  > to the Ant details.
>
>
> Fixed.
>
>
>  > The directory:
>  >
>  > src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/functors
>  >
>  > is empty and could perhaps be deleted?
>
>
> Deleted.
>
>
>  >>  Site:
>  >>
>  >>  
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/collections/3.3/RC1/site/index.html
>  >
>  > It would be useful to mention the Java version requirement more
>  > prominently, e.g. on the front page and/or in the dependencies report.
>
>
> Dependencies report is presumably not easy to customize. Front page added.
>
>
>  > The ApacheCon logo is out of date.
>
>
> Handled elsewhere.
>
>
>  >>  Binaries:
>  >>
>  >>  
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/collections/3.3/RC1/staged/commons-collections/commons-collections/3.3/
>  >
>  > It would be useful to record the Md5 hashes, because the same file
>  > names will be used for RC2 etc:
>
>
> I don't understand.
>

The file names don't include the RCn suffix, so a second RC would use
the same name.
The MD5s are needed to ensure that we are voting on the same artifacts.

>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-bin.tar.gz.md5
>  > 9fff73c7eb945b89beb8a63c47dd3191
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-bin.zip.md5
>  > 63db5cbf9fa54e0876fa8249b27ee3a7
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-javadoc.jar.md5
>  > 4c4f4fda141295cb8267ae251f09c5f1
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-sources.jar.md5
>  > 125c0db7c344749a5b05bf3b953267cf
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-src.tar.gz.md5
>  > 308212cfa1d180df373e0fad1a517325
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3-src.zip.md5
>  > fef79aae60d779bea7e65fe63a49cea3
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3.jar.md5
>  > c142e4e4c9e4310b6570250ae6b76aff
>  >
>  > commons-collections-3.3.pom.md5
>  > 40e4cb46b2d6332ba52ca300716e3bdc
>  >
>  > It would also be useful to include the file name in the MD5 and SHA1 
> files, e.g.
>  >
>  > 40e4cb46b2d6332ba52ca300716e3bdc *commons-collections-3.3.pom
>  >
>  > The tgz and zip archives agree with each other, and the source archive
>  > agrees with SVN apart from CRLF/LF differences and times in SVN $Date:
>  > markers, which are unfortunately expressed in local time.
>  >
>  > Source builds and tests OK using:
>  > * Ant 1.7.1/Java 1.3.1
>  > Total time: 4 minutes 14 seconds
>  >
>  > * Maven 2.10/Java 1.4.2
>  > Tests run: 13023, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 43.422 
> sec
>  >
>  > I've no idea why the Ant tests take so much longer.
>  > Part of it is probably that they run as separate tests, but surely
>  > that cannot account for all the extra time?
>  >
>  > Are there some tests missed out by Maven?
>  >
>  > The jars all have N&L files.
>  >
>  > It would be nice if the javadoc and source jar manifests included the
>  > Specification and Implementation headers. See commons-compress pom.xml
>  > for how to add these.
>
>
> Done. Presumably there's a Maven2 bug that stops us fixing this in the parent?
>

No idea. I think it's only recently that the source and javadoc
plugins were updated to support the manifests, so it might work if it
were tried now.

>  > -1 based on the missing AL headers and wrong Copyright year.
>
>
> Thanks Sebb.
>
>
>  Hen
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to