On 20/05/2009, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > I believe I have addressed all the currently known issues standing > between the pool code and a 1.5 release. > > I know Phil is doing / will be doing various performance tests. If > anyone else has any issues now would be a good time to mention it.
Just spotted: GenericKeyedObjectPool.ObjectTimestampPair.value GenericKeyedObjectPool.ObjectTimestampPair.tstamp could be made private & final. This will make the class immutable and thread-safe. If GKOP.ObjectQueue is shared between threads, then activeCount needs to be synchronized. Just changing the increment/decrement methods to include the field in the synch. block should work, as the read access is in GenericKeyedObjectPool.getNumActive() which synch.s on the same lock. > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
