> I think its really important that [collections] has no dependencies. As part 
> of that, I'd also suggest that [functor] shouldn't have dependencies.
>
> While I understand the arguments of just picking up another jar if your using 
> it, of tools like maven, and of eating dog food, when push comes to shove, I 
> believe that one of the core conceptual attributes of [collections] is that 
> it stands alone. The list archives contains more detailed discussion on this 
> for those wanting to hunt it down ;-)
>
> Given that I am removed from the coding aspects of this these days, I won't 
> -1 any decisions on this. But I will register that I believe my position very 
> strongly.

I keep on saying that: let's use dependency in-lining

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to