> I think its really important that [collections] has no dependencies. As part > of that, I'd also suggest that [functor] shouldn't have dependencies. > > While I understand the arguments of just picking up another jar if your using > it, of tools like maven, and of eating dog food, when push comes to shove, I > believe that one of the core conceptual attributes of [collections] is that > it stands alone. The list archives contains more detailed discussion on this > for those wanting to hunt it down ;-) > > Given that I am removed from the coding aspects of this these days, I won't > -1 any decisions on this. But I will register that I believe my position very > strongly.
I keep on saying that: let's use dependency in-lining --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org