Ted Dunning wrote:
> My view is that once it is immutable it is immutable.  Restoring mutability
> is done by making a new copy [...].

That position is stronger than you make it sound.  Changing a supposedly
immutable object so that it is mutable would itself be a mutation.  If it were
possible then the object in question was never genuinely immutable in the
first place.


John


      

Reply via email to