On 06/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2009-03-06, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 2009-03-06, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Adding back the .getClassLoader() stage improves matters, > > >> That really isn't supposed to make any difference, strange. > > > Class.getResource() makes these changes to the resource name: > > > "if the resource name starts with "/", it is unchanged; otherwise, the > > package name is prepended to the resource name after converting "." to > > "/". " > > > ClassLoader.getResource() does not do this. > > > I knew that (but assumed the path names were startng with a slash), it > shouldn't make any difference WRT whitespace was what I meant.
Probably not - but the test does not get that far, as it fails on the first file... > Sorry I was unclear Likewise, I could have been more explicit... > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
