On 24/02/2009, Siegfried Goeschl <siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote: > Hi folks, > > the current feedback requires a cancellation and a discussion > > 1) wrong download link in email - was a copy and paste error on my side > > 2) improved manifest in sources and javadoc jar - seems to be a parent > pom issue and effects all M2 releases (checked commons-cli, > commons-digester, commons-io, commons-jxpath) > > 3) wrong versioning schema, e.g. "commons-exec-1.0.0" - according to > http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html the versioning is > either correct or the docs are wrong
I had not seen that. However, as far as I can tell, hardly any of the other commons components uses the final [.0]. Only NET seems to have started with 1.0.0. As I understand it, point releases are used for minor updates to an *existing* release. E.g. Commons Lang released 1.0 and then 1.0.1. So although it appears to be allowed by the document, I think it would be better to reserve the point marker for point releases. > 4) missing findbugs-exclude-filter.xml - well, that's a blocker > > > So the open questions are .... > > ad 2) any quick ideas how to fix that? I will dig though the parent pom > otherwise ... > > ad 3) can we agree an ONE schema which is properly documented - I'm fed > up with some undocumented guidelines resulting in not enough +1 to get > commons-exec out of the door, e.g. groupId or versioning. I propose we > find a common understanding which I put into the commons wiki. If there are any clarifications to be made, the versioning guidelines document needs to be updated, not the wiki. > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > the next release candidate .... > > > > Tag: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_0 > > > > Site: > > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/exec/1.0.0/RC4/site/index.html > > > > Binaries: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/exec/1.0.0/RC4/staged/commons-exec/commons-exec/1.0.0/ > > > > [ ] +1 release it > > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because > > > > > > Let the fun begin ... > > > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > PS: The test distribution is not part of the release but handy for > > platform testing - > > http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
