Yeah, I would think it safe to say we target 1.4+. I would even consider going 1.5+. But it doesn't really help the API much IMO.
cheers -- Torsten On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 06:42, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > there is no official baseline, but we use some 1.4 features in > compress and we didn't feel the urgent need to optimize for 1.1. I > would say go for it. > > Cheers > Christian > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just merged two changes made to the Ant zip code base - >> commons-compress' great-grand-parent - into the sandbox and intend to >> keep doing this as we make changes in Ant. >> >> There is another change in Ant that may lead to a tiny performance >> improvement by using JDK 1.4 collections (LinkedHashMap) instead of >> Java 1.1 ones. I'm not sure whether I can savely merge this or >> whether commons-compress intends to target JVMs < 1.4. >> >> Is there some sort of official baseline? >> >> Stefan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
