On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
> <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> + } finally {
>>>> + if (!successful) {
>>>> + for (Iterator iterator = items.iterator();
>>>> iterator.hasNext();) {
>>>> + FileItem fileItem = (FileItem) iterator.next();
>>>> + try {
>>>> + fileItem.delete();
>>>> + } catch (Throwable e) {
>>>> + // ignore it
>>>> + }
>>>
>>>
>>> Catch the bits that makes sense to ignore here?
>>
>> Don't know, whether I understand your question right, Rahul.
> <snip/>
>
> Similar to SCXML-103 [1] -- the above may be flagged for the same reason.
I have read that bug and I disagree with the conclusion. I always
would want to see the first exception and not prioritize them.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use my telephone.
-- (Bjarne Stroustrup,
http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#really-say-that
My guess: Nokia E50)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
