Is anyone actively working on commons-vfs? I have spent the last week
making trunk actually run the unit tests that use a local file system
with Maven 2 as well as getting it to run those pointed at a remote
repository if the url property is defined in settings.xml. I have
also added webdav using Jackrabbit and removed the webdav using Slide
that was in the sandbox. I've still got some more things to do, but I
would like to check this into trunk. I'm not sure who to ask for
"approval" from since the last message regarding VFS in October
indicated there weren't many (any?) active developers.
Ralph
On Jan 1, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I'm working on commons vfs trying to implement webdav using the
Jackrabbit client. I finished coding it but before trying to test
that I wanted to test the existing providers to make sure I have a
basic setup working. I've looked at http://commons.apache.org/vfs/testserver.html
and a number of things don't make sense to me.
1. It references test-data/read-tests. No such directory exists in
subversion. Instead, the directory is actually named test-data/
basedir, which seems like a mistake.
2. It describes doing things with ant or the RunTest class, but the
build mvn install works fine, although many of the unit tests being
run are incorrectly set up (see below).
3. test-data/write-tests doesn't exist. It should be present in
subversion with a dummy file so that mvn test will just work, or it
should be created automatically when running the build.
4. None of the provider test cases actually extend Junit TestCase,
so nothing happens when you try to run them.
5. Changing AbstractProviderTestConfig to extend
AbstractProviderTestCase, which seems like what should happen
generates an error since AbstractProviderTestCase declares
getBaseTestFolder to be protected while it is also declared in the
ProviderTestConfig interface, which means it has to be public in
AbstractProviderTestCase.
6. Fixing all this and then running mvn test gets all kinds of
errors, even on some of the providers that should work - like the
local provider.
I started all this on vfs trunk and noticed that it seems to be for
an as yet unreleased 2.0 so I went an looked at the 1.x branch but
it doesn't look a whole lot different.
Do these tests really run?
Should I be working on trunk (2.0) vs vfs-1-trunk (1.x)? Is there
any real difference between them?
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
