On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Ralph Goers schrieb:
The problem is that in applications using commons config they would
like to specify an interface in lots of places.
HierarchicalConfiguration would be perfect for that. It should just
extend the Configuration interface.
It was discussed that in configuration2 all configurations are
hierarchical. In this case there would be the single Configuration
interface, but it would offer the enhanced functionality which is
now provided by HierarchicalConfiguration.
Now I'm really confused. If this is true then why is there a "flat"
package and why do things like the MapConfiguration extend from it?
I'm not sure how you intend to resolve this.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
